Zum Inhalt springen

FSG-Treffen 19-11-20: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Flora von Bayern
← Zum vorherigen VersionsunterschiedZum nächsten Versionsunterschied →
imported>Dagmar Triebel
imported>Dagmar Triebel
Zeile 100: Zeile 100:


*Czech partners
*Czech partners
** PLADIAS data from Czech FSG locations, together with very few data from Bavarian FSG locations could be provided for GBIF as separate data publication via Diversity Workbench data pipelines. An export of PLADIAS data from Czech (and Bavarian?) locations would be necessary. PLADIAS data managed in DWB for GBIF publication should met the Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license. For data publication via GBIF, the data with WGS84 coordinates, 1/64 grid etc. will be aggregated at GRID/Q level as regularily done in the Flora of Bavaria project. Each data package send to GBIF gets a DOI which can be cited.
** PLADIAS data from Czech FSG locations could be provided for GBIF as separate data publication via Diversity Workbench data pipelines. An export of PLADIAS data from Czech locations would be necessary. PLADIAS data managed in DWB for GBIF publication should met the Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license. For data publication via GBIF, the 1/64 grid etc. data will be aggregated at GRID/Quadrant level as regularily done in the Flora of Bavaria project. ****Marcel *** Data with WGS84 coordinates will bechanged from *** to ***. Each data package sent to GBIF gets a DOI which can be cited.


*Bavarian partners
*Bavarian partners
**In the near future the BioCASe guided export of BFL occurrence data will be restricted on taxa which are referenced in the BFL TaxRef (Bavarian taxon reference list *** link ***) and linked to a Tax-Ref ID. The suggestion to provide an export only with data converted to accepted names, would make an additional BioCASe data pipeline for export and data provision as separate xml zip archive necessary. The Bavarian partners want to avoid this. Thus the data have to be translated to accepted names by the Czech partners via the current taxon name list version. This is dynamically provided by the DTN Rest Web Service ***  (The BFL taxon list has the project ID: ...); see also [http://www.diversitymobile.net/wiki/How_to_use_the_DWB_REST_Webservice_for_Taxon_Lists REST-webservice provides taxon-ID]
**In the near future the BioCASe guided export of BFL occurrence data (BFLportal01, BFLportal 04) will be restricted on taxa which are referenced in the BFL TaxRef (Bavarian taxon reference list *** link Wiki ***) and linked to a Tax-Ref ID. The suggestion to provide an export only with data converted to accepted names would make an additional BioCASe data pipeline for export and data provision as separate xml zip archive necessary. The Bavarian partners want to avoid this. As a consequence the taxon names have to be translated to accepted names by the Czech partners via the current BFL TaxRef version. This version is dynamically provided by the DTN Rest Web Service ** link ***  (The BFL TaxRef the project ID: 216), see also [http://www.diversitymobile.net/wiki/How_to_use_the_DWB_REST_Webservice_for_Taxon_Lists REST-webservice provides taxon-ID]
**In near future the BioCASe occurrence data export package will include the taxon-ID for each record: ABCD-mapping for this will be improved, the ABCD element "identification/references-field" is proposed for this issue.  
**In near future the BioCASe occurrence data export packages will include the taxon-ID for each record: ABCD-mapping for this will be improved, the ABCD element "identification/references-field" is proposed for this issue.  
**Information on the geographic accuracy ("Unschärfe") will be exported in the future; it will be shown in exact value (meters) and as text (value for quadrant) ###eigentlich geht es hier um die Genauikeit von Punktkoordinaten einerseits und die Quadranten-Unschärfe andererseits MR: Quadrantenunschärfe ist immer ca. 12,7 km bei U und etwas weniger bei S, W, etc. Punktunschärfe ist immer ca. 2 km? entsprechend 2 Stellen hinter dem Komma.###
**Information on the geographic accuracy ("Unschärfe") will be exported in the future; it will be shown in exact value (meters) and as text (value for quadrant) ###eigentlich geht es hier um die Genauigkeit von Punktkoordinaten einerseits und die Quadranten-Unschärfe andererseits MR: Quadrantenunschärfe ist immer ca. 12,7 km bei U und etwas weniger bei S, W, etc. Punktunschärfe ist immer ca. 2 km? entsprechend 2 Stellen hinter dem Komma.###
**as an example of “Unschärfe” concerning quadrants see [https://wiki.bayernflora.de/web/Daten_der_Biotopkartierung_des_Bayerischen_Landesamts_f%C3%BCr_Umwelt_f%C3%BCr_die_Flora_von_Bayern Daten der Biotopkartierung]
**as an example of “Unschärfe” concerning quadrants see [https://wiki.bayernflora.de/web/Daten_der_Biotopkartierung_des_Bayerischen_Landesamts_f%C3%BCr_Umwelt_f%C3%BCr_die_Flora_von_Bayern Daten der Biotopkartierung]
**accuracy of coordinates will be shown in exaxt value (meters)
**accuracy of coordinates will be shown in exaxt value (meters)
** A new data package "BFLportal01 ?????" including the changes mentioned above is planned for January.  
** Two new data packages "BFLportal01" and "BFLportal04" including the changes mentioned above is planned for January.  




'''TOP 3''' Status quo: on management of taxonomic backbones
'''TOP 3''' Status quo: on management of taxonomic backbones
Taxon names with p.p. concepts concerns about 1.400 occurrence records in the FSG project. Solutions for this are searched by experts on a single-case basis.


* Czech partners
* Czech partners
**FSG consensus backbone of taxa for PLADIAS map presentation is hosted by Milan Štech
**FSG consensus backbone of taxa for PLADIAS map presentation is hosted by Milan Štech. A current version will be - for internal use - delivered to Wolfgang Diewald.


* Bavarian partners
* Bavarian partners
**Number of BFL taxref entities managed in DiversityTaxonNames for the Bavarian forest region (status November 2019): 1736 accepted names (1255 on species rank)
**Number of BFL taxref entities managed in DiversityTaxonNames for the Bavarian forest region (status November 2019): 1736 accepted names (1255 on species rank)


Further issues were already treated under TOP 3.
Further issues were already treated under TOP 2.


'''TOP 4''' Status quo: on common web presentation of the project
'''TOP 4''' Status quo: on common web presentation of the project
Zeile 127: Zeile 125:
*Requests for the modification of the web presentation can be communicated to (wer ist ansprechpartner dafür?)###.
*Requests for the modification of the web presentation can be communicated to (wer ist ansprechpartner dafür?)###.
*Work on the [http://www.florasilvaegabretae.eu/ project website] is in progress. The text will be in Czech and German, main chapters also in English. At the moment the German text ist not satisfying. The text of the main chapters should be finished and translated to German by Czech partners as soon as possible. Text blocks on the [https://wiki.bayernflora.de/web/Flora_des_B%C3%B6hmerwaldes_%E2%80%93_Kv%C4%9Btena_%C5%A0umavy_%E2%80%93_Flora_Silvae_Gabretae Flora von Bayern website] can be used as a template. After this first level translation is done, the German language emendment, especially concerning the discipline-specific wording, will be done by Cornelia Straubinger (with assistance of Wolfgang Diewald and Dagmar Triebel).
*Work on the [http://www.florasilvaegabretae.eu/ project website] is in progress. The text will be in Czech and German, main chapters also in English. At the moment the German text ist not satisfying. The text of the main chapters should be finished and translated to German by Czech partners as soon as possible. Text blocks on the [https://wiki.bayernflora.de/web/Flora_des_B%C3%B6hmerwaldes_%E2%80%93_Kv%C4%9Btena_%C5%A0umavy_%E2%80%93_Flora_Silvae_Gabretae Flora von Bayern website] can be used as a template. After this first level translation is done, the German language emendment, especially concerning the discipline-specific wording, will be done by Cornelia Straubinger (with assistance of Wolfgang Diewald and Dagmar Triebel).
*Plant descriptions/characteristics will be written in Czech and then translated into German. This task has already started and is realised as free-text descriptioons under fixed topic headers. Alternatively, descriptions could be created in a semi-structured or structured way using management tools as [https://diversityworkbench.net/Portal/DiversityDescriptions DiversityDescriptions]. Diversity Description provides a flexible data model, characters, character states and character groups as well as character dependencies can be defined and translations can be automatized. Examples for the use of DiversityDescriptions: [[Quiz| Heilpflanzen-Quiz]], [http://www.deemy.de/ DEEMY]
*Plant descriptions/characteristics will be written in Czech and then translated into German. This task has already started and is realised as free-text descriptions without fixed topic headers. Alternatively, descriptions could be created in a semi-structured or structured way using management tools as [https://diversityworkbench.net/Portal/DiversityDescriptions DiversityDescriptions]. DiversityDescriptions provides a flexible data model. Characters, character states and character groups as well as character dependencies can be defined and translations can be automatized. Examples for the use of DiversityDescriptions: [[Quiz| Heilpflanzen-Quiz]], [http://www.deemy.de/ DEEMY]
*Additional plant fotos taken from plants in the FSG region will be needed. Milan Štech started with imaging and collectiong fotos of common plants.
*Additional plant images taken from plants in the FSG region will be needed. Milan Štech started with imaging and collectiong fotos of common plants.




Zeile 134: Zeile 132:


* Czech partners
* Czech partners
**Floristic status will not (###habe ich das richtig verstanden? MR: das ist an mir vorbeigegangen###) be indicated in the maps at the [http://www.florasilvaegabretae.eu/ project website]. Nevertheless the floristic status (?? Czech concept, i.e. native, ***) will be mentioned in the plant descriptions.
**Floristic status will not ??? be indicated in the maps at the [http://www.florasilvaegabretae.eu/ project website] *** TESTE Milan Stech?  ****. Nevertheless the floristic status (Czech concept, i.e. native, ***) will be mentioned in the plant descriptions.


* Bavarian partners
* Bavarian partners
**A [https://wiki.bayernflora.de/web/Flora_von_Bayern_%E2%80%93_Floristischer_Status#Supplement "translation" table] for right conversion of status entries from DiversityCollection to PLADIAS is provided.
**A [https://wiki.bayernflora.de/web/Flora_von_Bayern_%E2%80%93_Floristischer_Status#Supplement "translation" table] for correct translation of status categories from DiversityCollection to PLADIAS is provided.
**Currently the BioCASe data package (BFLportal 01 ???) is providing several entries for status: original status and several processed status (in one line). The status mentioned at last is the one to be used by the FSG project. At the moment there is no consensus if all entries (original and processed status) should be exported or only the first and the last. An additional text field in ABCD (MeasurementOrFactText) will contain the information of the sequence of the status. In near future there will be a documentation with the definition on the various indications on floristic status for one and the same occurrence record.
**Currently the BioCASe data package (BFLportal 01) is providing several entries for status: original status and several processed status (in one line). The last mentioned status is the one to be used by the FSG project. At the moment there is no consensus whether all entries (original and processed status) should be exported or only the first and the last. An additional text field in ABCD (MeasurementOrFactText) will contain the information of the sequence of the status. There is also a discussion point whether the management in DC could be improuved (DC: Analysis, Method) **** Markus, *** Tanja **`*  In near future there will be a documentation with the definition on the various indications on floristic status for one and the same occurrence record.






'''TOP 6''' To Dos and priorities
'''TOP 6''' To Dos and priorities
*The partners discussed the option to publish a data paper in the Biodiversity Data Journal (e.g. on challenges with FSG data and a description of the datasets and data pipelines involved) [https://bdj.pensoft.net/browse_journal_articles.php?form_name=filter_articles&sortby=1&journal_id=1&search_in_=0&section_type%5B%5D=8 Biodiversity Data Journal Data Papers]. It will be a technical paper which should contain aspects we discussed today, describe the data pipelines and desribe the management of two kinds of checklist and different status systems. The draft of this paper should be written during the second half of next year.
*The partners discussed the option to publish a data paper in the Biodiversity Data Journal (e.g. on challenges with FSG data and a description of the datasets and data pipelines involved) [https://bdj.pensoft.net/browse_journal_articles.php?form_name=filter_articles&sortby=1&journal_id=1&search_in_=0&section_type%5B%5D=8 Biodiversity Data Journal Data Papers]. It will be a technical paper which should contain aspects we discussed at this FSG meeting. The draft of this paper should be written during the second half of next year.
*Milan Štech plans a paper (in English??) with botanical aspects of the FSG project in one of the serials of [https://botanospol.cz/ ČBS] ([http://www.preslia.cz/ Preslia]).
*Milan Štech coorinates a paper in English with botanical aspects of the FSG project in one of the serials of [https://botanospol.cz/ ČBS], e.g., ([http://www.preslia.cz/ Preslia]).
*First results of the FSG project might be presented to the Bayerische Botanische Gesellschaft in 2021.
*First results of the FSG project might be presented to the Bayerische Botanische Gesellschaft in 2021.


Version vom 27. November 2019, 13:32 Uhr

FSG Technical Meeting

The meeting will focus an technical issues concerning data pipelines and web presentations of the project Flora des Böhmerwaldes – Květena Šumavy – Flora Silvae Gabretae (=FSG)

Participants

Wolfgang Diewald, Eva Holá, Petr Novotný, Martin Rohn, Marcel Ruff, Stefan Seifert, Milan Štech, Dagmar Triebel, Tanja Weibulat, Markus Weiss

Venue

SNSB IT-Zentrum
Botanische Staatssammlung München
Menzinger Str. 67
right wing of the building, groundfloor, room no. 035.
80638 München

  • Contact: Wolfgang Diewald (diewaldatsnsb.de), Tel. 089/17861253 or Dagmar Triebel (triebelatsnsb.de), Tel. 089/17861252


Getting there:

  • From Munich airport (duration about 60 min): Take S1 in the direction of 'München Hauptbahnhof'. There is a 'S-Bahn' every 20 minutes. Get off the train at the stop 'Moosach'. All stops can be found on the map 'S-Bahn, U-Bahn und Regionalzug im MVV'. At Moosach station take bus no. 51 in the direction 'Aidenbachstraße' (there is a bus every 10 minutes) and get off at 'Maria-Ward-Straße'. From here you can walk the 400 m along Menzingerstraße or otherwise take bus line 17 (direction Amalienburgstraße) and get off one stop later ('Botanischer Garten München-Nymphenburg'). Details are given under MVV Fahrplanauskunft.
  • From Munich main station (duration about 30 min): Start at 'Hauptbahnhof Süd' by taking bus 17 to 'Amalienburgstraße'. There is a bus every 10 min. Get of the bus at 'Botanischer Garten München-Nymphenburg'. Details are given under MVV Fahrplanauskunft.

WLAN: Snsb_IT_Center_4

Agenda

TOP 1 Status quo: data mobilisation (generation of new data, processing of historical data)

Czech partners, Bavarian partners


TOP 2 Status quo: occurrence data processing until data provision

(technical improvements, ABCD mapping, withhold of data not assigned to taxref-numbers)

Czech partners, Bavarian partners


TOP 3 Status quo: on management of taxonomic backbones

(challenge: names with p.p. concepts (1.400 datasets), FSG consensus backbone of taxa?

Czech partners, Bavarian partners


TOP 4 Status quo: on common web presentation of the project


TOP 5 Status quo: "in situ" floristic status categories and processing

Czech partners, Bavarian partners


TOP 6 To Dos and priorities



AOB

(Internal) documentation of FSG related data pipelines and data flows?

Minutes

Responsible for minutes: Wolfgang Diewald, Marcel Ruff, with input from all participants


TOP 1 Status quo: data mobilisation (generation of new data, processing of historical data)

  • Czech partners
    • number of records in PLADIAS: 605.000
    • number of records 2019 from Czech locations: 20.000 (will be imported in PLADIAS in spring)
    • in PLADIAS only data from Czech locations and within a 100 m range outside of the borders of Czech Republic can be managed; thus there are not very much data from Bavarian locations kept in PLADIAS and those data are under a closed license, therefore no action is necessary.
    • Further data from Bavarian locations (e. g. by M. Lepši & P. Lepši) - not kept in PLADIAS - are existing. They will be prepared and delivered to Marcel (cc: Tanja Weibulat and Wolfgang Diewald). They will not be added to BFLportal01 as this project is for Bavarian data only. They could be provided by PLADIAS partners for DWB import in a format, as indicated under template tables.
  • Bavarian partners
    • number of records in DiversityCollection: 316.000 (< 12.000 with point coordinates)
    • number of records 2019 for the Bavarian forest region (FSG project): 7490, all with point coordinates; incl. 496 from Czech locations; Czech data will be exported and given to Milan Štech and Zdenek Kaplan, those Czech data (license CC BY) will not be imported in PLADIAS, but visualized in the common maps).
    • number of records 2019 for the Bavarian forest region (Klotz, BASG): ?
    • number of historical records to be processed in 2020 (Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald): 50.000
    • number of historical records to be quality-improved in 2020 (Florein database Diewald --> updating existing records): 80.000


TOP 2 Status quo: occurrence data processing until data provision

(technical improvements, ABCD mapping, withhold of data not assigned to taxref-numbers)

  • Czech partners
    • PLADIAS data from Czech FSG locations could be provided for GBIF as separate data publication via Diversity Workbench data pipelines. An export of PLADIAS data from Czech locations would be necessary. PLADIAS data managed in DWB for GBIF publication should met the Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license. For data publication via GBIF, the 1/64 grid etc. data will be aggregated at GRID/Quadrant level as regularily done in the Flora of Bavaria project. ****Marcel *** Data with WGS84 coordinates will bechanged from *** to ***. Each data package sent to GBIF gets a DOI which can be cited.
  • Bavarian partners
    • In the near future the BioCASe guided export of BFL occurrence data (BFLportal01, BFLportal 04) will be restricted on taxa which are referenced in the BFL TaxRef (Bavarian taxon reference list *** link Wiki ***) and linked to a Tax-Ref ID. The suggestion to provide an export only with data converted to accepted names would make an additional BioCASe data pipeline for export and data provision as separate xml zip archive necessary. The Bavarian partners want to avoid this. As a consequence the taxon names have to be translated to accepted names by the Czech partners via the current BFL TaxRef version. This version is dynamically provided by the DTN Rest Web Service ** link *** (The BFL TaxRef the project ID: 216), see also REST-webservice provides taxon-ID
    • In near future the BioCASe occurrence data export packages will include the taxon-ID for each record: ABCD-mapping for this will be improved, the ABCD element "identification/references-field" is proposed for this issue.
    • Information on the geographic accuracy ("Unschärfe") will be exported in the future; it will be shown in exact value (meters) and as text (value for quadrant) ###eigentlich geht es hier um die Genauigkeit von Punktkoordinaten einerseits und die Quadranten-Unschärfe andererseits MR: Quadrantenunschärfe ist immer ca. 12,7 km bei U und etwas weniger bei S, W, etc. Punktunschärfe ist immer ca. 2 km? entsprechend 2 Stellen hinter dem Komma.###
    • as an example of “Unschärfe” concerning quadrants see Daten der Biotopkartierung
    • accuracy of coordinates will be shown in exaxt value (meters)
    • Two new data packages "BFLportal01" and "BFLportal04" including the changes mentioned above is planned for January.


TOP 3 Status quo: on management of taxonomic backbones

  • Czech partners
    • FSG consensus backbone of taxa for PLADIAS map presentation is hosted by Milan Štech. A current version will be - for internal use - delivered to Wolfgang Diewald.
  • Bavarian partners
    • Number of BFL taxref entities managed in DiversityTaxonNames for the Bavarian forest region (status November 2019): 1736 accepted names (1255 on species rank)

Further issues were already treated under TOP 2.

TOP 4 Status quo: on common web presentation of the project

  • Requests for the modification of the web presentation can be communicated to (wer ist ansprechpartner dafür?)###.
  • Work on the project website is in progress. The text will be in Czech and German, main chapters also in English. At the moment the German text ist not satisfying. The text of the main chapters should be finished and translated to German by Czech partners as soon as possible. Text blocks on the Flora von Bayern website can be used as a template. After this first level translation is done, the German language emendment, especially concerning the discipline-specific wording, will be done by Cornelia Straubinger (with assistance of Wolfgang Diewald and Dagmar Triebel).
  • Plant descriptions/characteristics will be written in Czech and then translated into German. This task has already started and is realised as free-text descriptions without fixed topic headers. Alternatively, descriptions could be created in a semi-structured or structured way using management tools as DiversityDescriptions. DiversityDescriptions provides a flexible data model. Characters, character states and character groups as well as character dependencies can be defined and translations can be automatized. Examples for the use of DiversityDescriptions: Heilpflanzen-Quiz, DEEMY
  • Additional plant images taken from plants in the FSG region will be needed. Milan Štech started with imaging and collectiong fotos of common plants.


TOP 5 Status quo: "in situ" floristic status categories and processing

  • Czech partners
    • Floristic status will not ??? be indicated in the maps at the project website *** TESTE Milan Stech? ****. Nevertheless the floristic status (Czech concept, i.e. native, ***) will be mentioned in the plant descriptions.
  • Bavarian partners
    • A "translation" table for correct translation of status categories from DiversityCollection to PLADIAS is provided.
    • Currently the BioCASe data package (BFLportal 01) is providing several entries for status: original status and several processed status (in one line). The last mentioned status is the one to be used by the FSG project. At the moment there is no consensus whether all entries (original and processed status) should be exported or only the first and the last. An additional text field in ABCD (MeasurementOrFactText) will contain the information of the sequence of the status. There is also a discussion point whether the management in DC could be improuved (DC: Analysis, Method) **** Markus, *** Tanja **`* In near future there will be a documentation with the definition on the various indications on floristic status for one and the same occurrence record.


TOP 6 To Dos and priorities

  • The partners discussed the option to publish a data paper in the Biodiversity Data Journal (e.g. on challenges with FSG data and a description of the datasets and data pipelines involved) Biodiversity Data Journal Data Papers. It will be a technical paper which should contain aspects we discussed at this FSG meeting. The draft of this paper should be written during the second half of next year.
  • Milan Štech coorinates a paper in English with botanical aspects of the FSG project in one of the serials of ČBS, e.g., (Preslia).
  • First results of the FSG project might be presented to the Bayerische Botanische Gesellschaft in 2021.


AOB

  • The need to (internally) document the FSG-related data pipelines and data flows is emphasised.
  • The date for the submission of the first annual reports is December (first week). The reports should be very short and be coordinated with Radka Bunešová and Katka Zemanová.

Useful links

Abgerufen von „https://www.bayernflora.de/index.php?title=FSG-Treffen_19-11-20&oldid=25854“